Oscar Knight
Forum Coordinator
Oscar Knight of Clayton County
Posts: 14,079
|
Post by Oscar Knight on Oct 18, 2013 14:41:57 GMT -6
Video: Guy in Bloomberg gun-control ads breaks all the major rules of gun safety Michael Bloomberg’s Anti-Gun Ad Flops As Actor Breaks First Two Rules Of Gun Safety
|
|
Oscar Knight
Forum Coordinator
Oscar Knight of Clayton County
Posts: 14,079
|
Post by Oscar Knight on Oct 18, 2013 14:50:34 GMT -6
Dianne Feinstein : Stuck In 1994 .......When the first Assault Weapon Ban was passed in 1994, this was what The Internet look like : Windows 95 ........The Assault Weapon Ban of 1994 was passed; This was before the average Gun Owners had Personal Computers !!!! ;D ;D Dec. 19, 2012 Obama Takes a First Step on Gun Control After Sandy Hook Dianne Feinstein's Assault Weapons Ban of 2013 ........Published on Mar 12, 2013
Dianne Feinstein gets schooled on her own BILL at Judiciary Committee SH-216
Emily Miller:
"The World According to Dianne Feinstein is very different than Reality"
|
|
Oscar Knight
Forum Coordinator
Oscar Knight of Clayton County
Posts: 14,079
|
Post by Oscar Knight on Oct 18, 2013 14:53:02 GMT -6
2013 TED CRUZ vs DIANNE FEINSTEIN "Note to Dianne Feinstein: Yeah, You Do Need to be Lectured on the Constitution"
|
|
Oscar Knight
Forum Coordinator
Oscar Knight of Clayton County
Posts: 14,079
|
Post by Oscar Knight on Oct 18, 2013 14:57:16 GMT -6
.......The News Room had a Democrat at the Desk, and he was dumb as a rock about firearms : ...........Gun Grabbing Liberal Democrats are nothing but Lying Hypocrites : The Proof .......Law Abiding Citizens are fed up with these phony worthless "Gun Control" Laws, and we are hip to these motives to strip The Second Amendment.
.....What we need the most is "Jackass Control", to protect Our Lawful Rights, from those like Dianne Feinstein :
|
|
Oscar Knight
Forum Coordinator
Oscar Knight of Clayton County
Posts: 14,079
|
Post by Oscar Knight on Oct 18, 2013 15:08:33 GMT -6
Dianne Feinstein Assaulting Our 1st Amendment Rights to Free Speech : We have already seen how Dianne Feinstein interprets our Second Amendment Rights......How does she interpret our First Amendment Rights ? ....According to my own math, Dianne Feinstein's Bill to restrict our Freedom of Speech, might have something to do with her own failures strip away our Second Amendment Rights.
|
|
Oscar Knight
Forum Coordinator
Oscar Knight of Clayton County
Posts: 14,079
|
Post by Oscar Knight on Oct 18, 2013 15:45:35 GMT -6
Frank Lautenberg Dies Watchdog questions $174G death benefit for millionaire senator's wife ....For those that never knew about this Liberal Democrat Anti- Second Amendment Crapweasel, Frank Lautenberg was the one that cost many citizens the rights to bear arms under our Second Amendment....It called The Lautenberg Act (The Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban of 1996).. Still continues to rob us from the grave : I was the Guy Which Brought You The Lautenberg Act; heee, heee Frank Lautenberg - Democrat THE LAUTENBERG DOMESTIC CONFISCATION LAW Analysis by Gun Owners of America 8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102 Springfield, VA 22151 (703)321-8585
WHAT DOES THE LAUTENBERG LAW DO?
The Lautenberg Domestic Confiscation provision was signed into law on September 30, 1996, as section 658 of the Treasury-Postal portion of the omnibus appropriations bill. It adds to the list of "prohibited persons" persons convicted of a "... misdemeanor involving domestic violence."
WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE A "PROHIBITED PERSON"?
If you become a prohibited person, you can never again own or acquire a firearm of any type. The only exception is if you are subsequently pardoned or otherwise have your criminal record expunged.
WHAT IS A MISDEMEANOR?
A misdemeanor is a crime carrying a potential penalty of as little as one day in jail, irrespective of whether the person serves actual jail time. In other words, the law imposes a lifetime gun ban on offenses which, in many cases, are very minor in nature.
WHAT TYPE OF MISDEMEANOR CONVICTION WOULD CAUSE ME TO BECOME A "PROHIBITED PERSON"?
The Lautenberg language defines "misdemeanor crime of domestic violence" to include a misdemeanor that involves "the use or attempted use of physical force" against a family member. Hence, any actual or attempted violence against a spouse or son or daughter would certainly, if prosecuted successfully as a misdemeanor, subject you to a lifetime gun ban. In many jurisdictions, spanking your kids could result in a conviction which would prohibit you from ever again owning a firearm.
WOULD THE MISDEMEANOR HAVE TO INVOLVE VIOLENCE OR ATTEMPTED VIOLENCE?
No. We have seen that a misdemeanor involving violence (however slight) or attempted violence against a spouse, son, or daughter would certainly be covered. But the definition of "misdemeanor crime of domestic violence" goes on to include "the threatened use of a deadly weapon." Thus, a threat against a family member would also subject the offender to a lifetime gun ban, even if the threat were joking or the person making the threat did not have the wherewithal to carry it out.
DOES THE NEW LAW APPLY TO PAST CRIMES?
Yes. A misdemeanor committed fifty years ago would still subject an individual to a lifetime gun ban, even if he or she has lived a happily married life with the "victim" during the intervening period.
HOW LONG DOES A "PROHIBITED PERSON" HAVE TO TURN IN ALL HIS OR HER FIREARMS?
The law provides for no grace period. Technically, any newly created "prohibited person" is currently in danger of a felony conviction.
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?
It means that, if you are a "prohibited person" and you are convicted of possessing a firearm, you will be guilty of a felony which could subject you to a $250,000 fine and a ten year prison sentence.
WHAT ABOUT POLICEMEN AND SOLDIERS?
There is no exemption for law enforcement officials or members of the armed services. These persons, if they have been convicted of even minor misdemeanors against their spouses, will have to be disarmed and fired.
WHAT ABOUT BATTERED WOMEN WHO DEFENDED THEMSELVES?
There is no exemption for battered women who received minor misdemeanor convictions after they used force to defend themselves against their battering spouses. There are many battered women who fall into this category. They will now be unable to use firearms to protect themselves against their abusive and threatening husbands, even if they feel that their lives are endangered.
WHAT ARE THE LONG-TERM IMPLICATIONS OF THE LAW?
Because the law now imposes lifetime gun bans on persons who, in some cases, have engaged in no actual violence or attempted violence, it will only be a matter of time before anti-gun activists try to impose lifetime guns bans in non-domestic situations of minor misdemeanors involving violence (such as fist fights). Ultimately, an effort to impose a lifetime gun ban on all persons convicted of misdemeanors will be made.
|
|
Oscar Knight
Forum Coordinator
Oscar Knight of Clayton County
Posts: 14,079
|
Post by Oscar Knight on Oct 18, 2013 18:44:48 GMT -6
The story of Black-Jewish relations in the United States The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews
|
|
Oscar Knight
Forum Coordinator
Oscar Knight of Clayton County
Posts: 14,079
|
Post by Oscar Knight on Oct 19, 2013 20:26:07 GMT -6
The Flip Side to these Elected Officials : Jackie Mason Uploaded on Mar 25, 2007 Apr 19, 2007 ........Jackie Mason's response to the killings of VA Tech, and warnings about more Gun Control Laws : Published on Dec 17, 2012 Jews for the Preservation of Gun Ownership Jews for the Preservation of Gun Ownership
"Why Jews Hate Guns" ? ""Gun Control’s" Nazi Connection" "The Six Things Americans Should Know About the Second Amendment." Nazi Weapons (Firearm) Law "Gun Control's Nazi Connection" "By Jews For The Preservation of Firearms Ownership, Inc."
|
|