EDITORIAL: Who will have a say in the future?

[Oscar Knight]

www.news-daily.com/news/2012/oct/04/editorial-who-will-have-say-claytons-future/?c=69398

Quote : "Victor Hill or write-in candidate Garland Watkins."

...In my honest opinion; Garland Watkins is another option from having Victor Hill as our Sheriff. The same thing happened in 2008, when Kem Kimbrough was elected has our Sheriff. Speaking for myself, this is called force feeding the voters in this county with optional candidates.

....Riddle me with this Question :

......Why didn't Garland Watkins filed his candidacy, before the county elections ?.......Why Now ?...Was he waiting for the field to be narrowed ?........Was he waiting for Kimbrough tose to Hill ?........Is Watkins depending on Hill to be convicted in court ?

.....Maybe Garland Watkins can begin to answer these questions for us.

[Oscar Knight]

......This is what happens when a county has a single political party operated Government.

[Oscar Knight]

......Let this be known; During the Democrat Primaries, in 2008, My family and I voted for Garland Watkins because he seemed to be the most trusted and experienced. When the votes came in, and to my disappointment, Kimbrough was the winner. In my opinion, Kimbrough was forced upon the voters to prevent Hill from being re-elected. I had to cast my vote for Kimbrough, in order to get Hill out of the way, but when the General Election came around, I crossover to vote for Jack Rainwater, on the Republican ticket.....I have never been a fan of Hill or Kimbrough as our Sheriff.